Here we go again, folks. The EA FC 26 leaks are trickling out, and the news that Rodri is reportedly still a 90 overall just reinforces my long-standing belief that EA sometimes operates in a completely different dimension when it comes to player ratings. This isn't just about a number; it's about a consistent failure to accurately reflect real-world football dominance. For those planning to dive deep into Ultimate Team, getting your hands on FC 26 Coins is always a priority, but this kind of rating decision makes you question the value of any player in the game.

Rodri has been the undisputed king of the defensive midfield for a couple of years now. He's the silent assassin, the deep-lying playmaker, the defensive wall, and the clutch goalscorer all rolled into one. He's won everything there is to win, often being the most consistent and arguably most important player in an already stacked Manchester City side. To keep him at 90 feels less like a careful assessment and more like an arbitrary decision to avoid shaking up the 'established order' of their top players.

It beggars belief when you consider players who might be rated higher due to more 'flashy' attributes or perhaps a single breakout season. EA seems to have this weird bias where certain positions or play styles are inherently capped, regardless of real-world performance. A defensive midfielder, no matter how world-class, rarely seems to break into those ultra-elite 91+ tiers unless they're also scoring 20 goals a season, which isn't Rodri's primary role.

This disconnect isn't new. We've seen it with countless players over the years where their in-game rating simply doesn't align with their actual impact on the pitch. It dilutes the realism of the game and, frankly, undermines the effort of players like Rodri who consistently deliver at the highest level without needing to chase individual accolades or viral moments.

What message does this send? That consistent, understated brilliance isn't as valued as marketing appeal or easily digestible highlight clips? It makes the whole rating system feel less like a meritocracy and more like a popularity contest, or simply a way to control the game's economy and meta rather than truly representing football talent.

I'm genuinely frustrated. It's a small detail in the grand scheme of things, but it's indicative of a broader issue with how EA approaches its flagship football title. They have access to all the data, all the expert analysis, and yet they still manage to butcher some of the most obvious rating decisions. It's a shame for Rodri, and it's a shame for the players who appreciate genuine footballing quality.

So, yeah, my thoughts are pretty clear. This 90 rating for Rodri is another example of EA's bizarre rating methodology. Hopefully, future updates or special cards will rectify this, but for the base game, it's just wrong. If you're looking to still dominate in EA FC 26, don't forget to stock up on cheap FC 26 Coins to make sure you can build a formidable squad despite these head-scratching rating decisions.